This book offers a unique approach to reconciliation as a matter for negotiation bringing
together two bodies of theory in order to offer insights into resolving conflicts and achieving
lasting peace. It argues that reconciliation should not be simply accepted as an ¿agreed-upon
norm¿ within peacemaking processes but should receive serious attention from belligerents and
peace-brokers seeking to end violent conflicts through negotiation.The book explores different
meanings the term ¿reconciliation¿ might hold for parties in conflict - the end of overt
hostilities a transformation in the quality of relations between warring groups a vehicle of
accountability and punishment of human rights abusers or the means through which they might
somehow acquire amnesty and as a means of atonement and to material reparation. It considers
what gives energy to the idea of reconciliation in a conflict situation¿why do belligerents
become interested in settling their differences and changingtheir attitudes to one another?
Using a range of case studies and thematic discussion chapters in this book seek to tackle
these tough questions from a multidisciplinary perspective. Contributions to the book reveal
some of the complexities of national and international reconciliation projects but
particularly diverse understandings of reconciliation and how to achieve it. All conflicts
reflect unique dynamics aspirations and power realities. It is precisely because parties in
conflict differ in expectations of reconciliation outcomes that its processes should be
negotiated. This book is a valuable resource for both scholars and practitioners engaged in
resolving conflicts and transforming fragmented relations in conflict and post-conflict
situations.
