«In many ways» Robert J.C. Young writes «colonization from the very first carried with it the
seeds of its own destruction.» Imperial Affliction examines some ways in which Young's
observation could be applied to problems of subjectivity and influence within the colonizing
nations themselves particularly eighteenth-century Britain. How might these «seeds of
destruction» manifest themselves as problems of identity? How might the very selves with
greatest access to self-affirmation - the idea of the empire the idea of British citizenry
the idea of the British self - actually find themselves vulnerable confused or damaged? Using
multiple forms of postcolonial critique this book turns back to salient eighteenth-century
British lives and work for a different kind of enlightenment. Among its central subjects are
the elusive subjectivity of William Collins the exilic religious experience of William Cowper
and its multiple readings in the twentieth century by a self-fashioned exilic Donald Davie
the «missed encounter» between Christopher Smart and Samuel Johnson and the ways in which that
problem was re-inscribed in the work of W. Jackson Bate and Lionel Trilling the problem of
imperial fixity in James Cook's journals with a view to Gray's «Elegy» and Goldsmith's
«Deserted Village» and the problem of purity as a paradoxically privileged and exilic force in
the work of John Newton and Christopher Smart. In these explorations this book illustrates
both an expanded view of eighteenth-century colonial liabilities and a new emphasis on
postcolonial critique as a means of exploring the fissures always present in imperial ambition.
