The Nordic EU Member States are generally considered to have common perspectives and interests
regarding European integration. A differentiated look reveals though that fundamental
differences in the respective agendas towards certain policy fields exist. The increasing
number of refugees seeking protection within European borders in the last years has unveiled a
major divergence of interests particularly between Sweden and Finland regarding the common
European asylum policy: Sweden has within a few years turned into one of the continent's top
destinations for asylum seekers whereas Finland has characterized itself as one of Europe's
most restrictive asylum and migration management regimes. The openly stated differences of
these two countries both in terms of actual numbers and implemented national policy guidelines
are representative for the opposing political forces emerging within the European Union in
shaping the common asylum policy. Due to the increasing internal and external pressure on the
EU in managing the refugee crisis this issue has not only gained significant importance and
emphasis on a national level but also from a European point of view. This volume
differentiates the Nordic perspectives on shaping EU asylum policies by focusing on the two
contrasting country case studies of Sweden and Finland. Why have these neighbouring countries
characterized by similar economic and social welfare systems chosen such different approaches
in facing the challenges arising from the refugee crisis and in implementing asylum policies?
For both countries questions for the interests of key actors dominating the national debates
on asylum policy are prevalent. The respective agendas of Sweden and Finland their different
political approaches and problems inside their respective societies as well as the national
strategies at the European level in shaping the Common European Asylum System in light of the
refugee crisis are in the focus of the contributions.
